How is Sola Scriptura incoherent?

But if you read it through the filter of the traditions of a Trinity, you will miss it (like many miss Jesus telling Mary about Mary’s G-d being Jesus’s G-d). That is incoherent.

Later, Tertullian would lay the foundations of the Trinity.

The New Testament identifies Jesus. Literally, spelling it out in Acts 3.

Ben & Jerry’s board denounces ‘genocide in Gaza’ in ice-cream maker’s latest salvo against Israel - The Jerusalem Post

Nuda scriptura is scripture alone. Sola scriptura looks at the writings and the traditions, with the writings (source of the traditions) having greater relevance.

So, how does that affect the Athanasian Christian doctrine of the Trinity?

But it was not until the efforts to create a uniform Christianity at Nicaea that the concept became the accepted tradition, to create a universal (catholic) interpretation of the writings.

Do "flat-earthers" attempt to sail around the world to prove their theory? Would this support their belief in a flat Earth?

For example, Jesus has a God …

Considering that the traditions stem from interpretations based off the writings, sola scriptura would be the means to test the coherency of the traditions.

A Trinity was first mentioned as G-d, His Word and His Wisdom, by Theophilus of Antioch.

Why are flat Earthers made fun of when they seemingly don't exist? I have only met one flat Earther in 18 years.

John 20:17] Jesus said to her, “Do not cling to Me, for I have not yet ascended to My Father; but go to My brethren and say to them, ‘I am ascending to My Father and your Father, and to My God and your God.’ ”